Steps to Recovery Rehabilitation & Restitution
Understanding the CA UD Fight
LOGIC TRAIN ARRIVING. Because warranty deeds create abstracts on title which can never be perfected, that means that If title can never be perfected only the actual original Pass through Grantor/Owner can claim it back under TILA rescission because TOLLING IS IN FACT- MATTER OF LAW ESTOPPED.
Meaning that because these federalized industry genius' turned you into a creditor backing their collateral via a promise to pay a rent back through a pass through grantor trust, this is a CONFLICT OF LAW TOLLING AND ESTOPPEL BY LACHE UNDER IRS Rules Section 1121 when failure to disclose cause a loss of right to reinstate and at time of filing the tax payer return includes errors, is incomplete, or needs further review during a period for right of reinstatement . In layman terms it means these contracts are all made void per operation of law the moment someone puts in writing “I rescind” under TILA because no one disclosed to you the underlaying intent of the contract.
STEPS TO JUSTICE
UNDERSTANDING THE UD FIGHT
cal civ code 2941.9 (d)
(d) Any action taken pursuant to the authority granted in this section is not effective unless all the parties agreeing to the action sign, under penalty of perjury, a separate written document entitled Majority Action Affidavit stating the following:
(1) The action has been authorized pursuant to this section.
(2) None of the undersigned is a licensed real estate broker or an affiliate of the broker that is the issuer or servicer of the obligation secured by the deed of trust.
(3) The undersigned together hold more than 50 percent of the record beneficial interest of a series of notes secured by the same real property or of undivided interests in a note secured by real property equivalent to a series transaction.
(4) Notice of the action was sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, with return receipt requested, to each holder of an interest in the obligation secured by the deed of trust who has not joined in the execution of the substitution or this document.
Majority Action Affidavit 2941.9
Majority-Action-Law-sb_1638_bill_960924_chaptered
Case-Mantioning-Majority Action-AFFIDAVIT
"Any action taken" "is not effective" unless all parties "sign, under penalty of perjury" a "MAJORITY ACTION AFFIDAVIT" of more than 50 percent of the record beneficial interest of a series of notes secured by the same real property or of undivided interests in a note secured by real property equivalent to a series transaction-Translated to laymen terms it means they cannot issue a NOD or NTS without this - let allow throw you into UD without a lease agreement which is why I stated the following on the record, which in turn makes what they adjudicated upon a VOID judgement. In turn makes the judge an accomplice to tax avoidance. This particular judge denounced her oath when asked to uphold it by saying "I do not have to do that".
"I Declare for and on the record that everything up to this point has been without my consent, over my objections, and AGAINST MY WILL, and unless there is a living litigant here today, able swear under penalty of perjury that I have caused them an INJURY, I expect this case dismissed without prejudice.
Judge I need you to swear or affirm that what you said is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
I declare for and on the record
Objection hearsay inadmissible move to strike.
I appeal and resubmit.there is
Objection hearsay inadmissible move to strike.
Do you know for a fact the statement you made is true? Pen. Code §125. An unqualified statement of that which one does not know to be true is equivalent to a statement of that which one knows to be false.
Do you have a lease agreement on the record? CCP 1166
Judge, if you continue with this bogus case, it is with your FULL UNDERSTANDING that I will accept it as a DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, that the plaintiff does not have to have a valid claim, and will appeal that judgment"
CCP_1166.
Majority-Action-Law-sb_1638_bill_960924_chaptered
Case-Mantioning-Majority Action-AFFIDAVIT
Which these are the same objections Kamila Harris used for HBOR
Faith-OBJECTION-TO-DECLARATIONS-1 (4)
PENAL CODE Section 96.5 (a) Every judicial of cer, court commissioner, or referee who commits any act that he or she knows perverts or obstructs justice, is guilty of a public offense punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year.(b) Nothing in this section prohibits prosecution under paragraph(5)of subdivision (a) of Section 182 of the Penal Code or any other law.PEN_96.5.
I was denied the ability to request these - DISC-015 REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE— Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 96, 97 Judicial Council of California [Rev. January 1, 2007] form DISC-015
DISC-003/UD-106 FORM INTERROGATORIES—UNLAWFUL DETAINER Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.010-2030.410
So one you report that there is a Federal Substitution of a tax avoidance issue on your property this immediately becomes a Federal IRS issue where the Sheriff has a duty to investigate as State Courts hold no jurisdiction in such matters. If they fail in their duty to maintain the peace and proceed to serve you a State issued "Civil Matter" Writ of Possession they are in breach of the peace because they held a duty to investigate ALL criminal matters…
Police-Civil-Liability-Paper-FINAL
The law is specific, it states ANY breach of the Peace- as unlawful detainers are tenant landlord disputes and according the the Judges Benchguide to Unlawful Detainers - Property owners cannot even be triad at these courts, let alone have a writ of possession issued… Means you cannot lead a jury by telling them how to answer the questions which do not pertain to you.
bg31_2015
Which also violate the Civility Oaths for attorneys whom are engaging in blatant bribes in exchange for testimony.
CIVILITY OATH RULES-sc14-May_1
Claim Forms
There are several Claim Forms to be filled out. The hard part is filing a police report for grand theft as now the Police department is not allowing you to do this, so if you cannot you will need to report that to the sheriff as well so be sure to get the name of the officer who refused to submit the complaint.
Govt-Claim-Form
145305_Claim%20For%20Damages(SH-AD-672)(1)
Your county might not have one specific, but can just cross out, cant deny you cause of it.
Claim_Form7-10-2010(1)
Attach the No Duty Code to protect paperwork because without an indemnity bond the Sheriff is just as liable to you for the damages you incur
http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/code-of-civil-procedure/ccp-sect-262.html
INJUNCTIONS
injunctions WILL BE NEEDED against the sheriff to prevent them from enforcing any writs : to the clerk to prevent unverified docs from the plaintiff filed AND
to the judge, to prevent any further perversion of justice, prosecuting from the bench, or TESTIFYING
http://www.saclaw.org/wp-content/uploads/sbs-requesting-a-tro.pdf
this the cause of action "injunction" example
https://saclaw.org/wp-content/uploads/sbs-requesting-a-preliminary-injunction-by-noticed-motion.pdf
this is a "MOTION injunction" example
Now because this Judge has this REO side Civil RICO GIG going on, the claim forms need to be gathered and the wire fraud needs to be shown hitting Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, San Diego County, and Los Angeles County. This will be discussed as to move to a Writ of Prohibition against the League of Charters. In turn this should allow us safe access to these audits, which should be expanded to include the tax returns under a f4506t
If there is income that is showing that needs to be accounted for, then lets get some good CPA's and request IRS audits for accountability which can be reported
to the IRS if it exceeds $2M or the "individual" holds an income of $200k or more per year… this is the form to report it on.
The Courts themselves can be reported upon Form 14242 from the IRS as "promoters of abusive tax schemes:" https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f14242.pdf
remember we can file the 5949 concurrently.when the
f3949a is filed
What is needed is a complete overhaul of Title 31 USC 5330 or CFR 103.41 Title 18 USC 1960(a) & 5330 of Title 31 Chapter X United States because at the end of the day, all of this, is structured money laundering of our birth bonds…. (What SigTarp looks the other way upon) IRS Form 1099-OID is a form to which you can pay a discounted price, this is your right to reinstate.
or purchase buy back against your COLB which was traded long before you were born. We hold beneficial interests in our Birth Bonds to which the Federalized Banking industry used our signature against to borrow money from investors upon.
31 CFR 1029.210 - Anti-money laundering programs for loan or finance companies.
From here we can start working on the Qui Tam to pull these REMICS into a forced 303 BK.
Those whom are in BK or BK appeals - here is some additional research for you…
BK-FRAUD-1
Many--Sale.Order.BK-CASES-Will-of-the-Majority
void- ccc 2941.9
BK_sanction_summ_conf2012
Then you should file a F 9013-1.1.HEARING.NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION FOR:
Sanction Pursuant to Fed R Bankr P 9011 along with F 9013-1.1.HEARING.NOTICE.
EXHIBIT-Sanctions-cases
Sample - Motion for Sanctions
xxx-Sanctions_20Under_20Rule_2011-Complete_2010
Also we need this info for future claims and complaints
https://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/misc/5949.pdf
http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2674&context=mlr
CSD001RFA20151224A_092616(1)
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/broward/article125338904.ece/BINARY/Criminal%20complaint%20against%20Esteban%20Santiago
http://mortgagefraudblog.com/images/stories/uploaded_docs/baloguncomplaint.pdf
http://www.wildaid.org/sites/default/files/resources/erasmus%20complaint.pdf
FIRST ONE IS BEST
Alleg_Referral
QUI TAM-DAVID-14-1
New Inventory Motion For Sanctions 8-12-17 (2)-2